| PRESS
RELEASE - August 06
Measuring
return on investment in training: fight the fear and do it anyway
Measuring the value of
learning & development can itself actually create value
yet many senior Learning & Development professionals confess
to not grasping the nettle of rigorous valuation for fear of what
it might reveal. These are some of the findings of the extraordinarily
candid new research report ‘Be valued or be outsourced' by return on investment in
training specialists 3C Associates.
The research found that at
one end of the scale measurement was very basic: quality control
measures such as training days or cost/head and the ubiquitous Happy
Sheets. One respondent said they know how successful a programme
has been by the atmosphere in the training room. Other respondents
were frustrated by the futility of current measurement techniques-
one organisation admitted, “we have dropped the quality control
measures as they were expensive and always showed a positive outcome”.
Some respondents still find themselves ‘order takers' for functional
team heads with little part to play in setting L&D objectives
linked to business performance.
Taking a defensive position,
some HR Directors felt that if they got better at measuring ROI
in training there would be unwelcome pressure to measure the benefit
of other HR activities. Others believed strongly that measurement
of value added is simply ‘not possible'.
At the other end of the scale
the research found some very positive, honest and sophisticated
practice. Some participants are visibly linking L & D objectives
to business objectives and, in valuing effectiveness actually become
more effective. “If you know what works you can do more
of it and less of something else,” said one respondent.”
Another explained “I want
the L & D budget to be set on the value we add – not a % of
revenue” and “I know we add as much value as other teams and I want
to prove it.”
“Senior management must accept
some of the blame for a lack of rigour in measurement as L &
D is often not even discussed at Board level. Perversely, if the
CEO has a strong commitment to ‘people' or ‘development', the L
&D team feels exempt from scrutiny,” explains Hedda Bird, Managing
Director of 3C Associates who conducted the research. “It appears
from the research that the key skill for L&D professionals in
the future will be to make visible the links between L&D programmes
and business performance. This needs people to have the analytical
and financial skills to link L & D outcomes to the way their
business makes money and its sources of competitive advantage..”
This qualitative research
was conducted in April and May 2006 by in-depth interviews with
12 senior L & D professionals in major UK blue-chip employers.
The full research report is available only to participants but an
Executive Summary with a list of tools participants already use
and those ‘magic bullets' they would like to improve their valuation
technique is available from 3C Associates.
For a copy of the Executive
Summary, to interview Hedda Bird or for more information about 3C
please contact Helen Eades on 01491 411544 or email
her
|